Correspondence to and from the panel
This page has correspondence to and from the Waihoehoe Precinct expert consenting panel, and minutes and directions from the panel.
Minutes from the expert consenting panel
Minutes from the expert consenting panel
15 July 2022 – Minute 17
The panel issued Minute 17 regarding the decision not to circulate draft conditions and the relationship with Drury Centre and Drury East Stage 1 Precinct applications.
Minute 17 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 148KB)
12 July 2022 – Minute 16
The panel issued Minute 16. This was about the decision not to direct expert conferencing or to hold a hearing.
Minute 16 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 89KB)
22 June 2022 – Minute 15
The panel issued Minute 15, regarding a request for expert conferencing.
Minute 15 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 99KB)
10 June 2022 – Minutes 13 and 14
The panel issued Minute 14, extending the decision due date.
Minute 14 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 95KB)
The panel issued Minute 13 regarding the resumption of processing of the application.
Minute 13 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 96KB)
2 June 2022 – Minute 12
The panel issued Minute 12 regarding the appointment of technical adviser Leo Hills to advise the panel on matters relating to transport.
Minute 12 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 94KB)
23 May 2022 – Minute 11
The panel issued Minute 11, granting the requested suspension from 11.59 pm on 17 May 2022. Processing of the application will remain suspended until the applicant requests to resume processing.
Minute 11 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 101KB)
11 May 2022 – Minute 10
The panel issued Minute 10 regarding the appointment of technical advisors.
Minute 10 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 93KB)
21 April 2022 – Minute 9
The panel issued Minute 9 regarding resumption of processing of the application.
Minute 9 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 96KB)
8 April 2022 – Minute 8
The panel issued Minute 8 providing a record of their site visit. The Minute also outlines the appointment of technical advisers to the panel.
Minute 8 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 96KB)
7 April 2022 – Minute 7
The panel issued Minute 7 accepting a comment from Josephine Kleinsman.
Minute 7 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 95KB)
1 April 2022 – Minute 6
The panel issued Minute 6 in response to correspondence from Paul Christiansen questioning the opportunity to address concerns directly with the panel.
Minute 6 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 91KB)
24 March 2022 – Minute 5
The panel issued Minute 5 regarding suspension of the processing of the application.
Minute 5 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 96KB)
16 March 2022 – Minute 4
The panel issued Minute 4 in response to correspondence received from Environmental Defence Society (EDS). The correspondence from EDS suggests the panel appoints an ecologist as a special advisor to the the panel.
Minute 4 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 90KB)
Correspondence from EDS in relation to invitation to comment on the application (PDF, 215KB)
16 March 2022 – Minute 3
The panel issued Minute 3 directing the cultural impact assessments by Ngai Tai ki Tamaki and Ngaati Whanaunga be withheld for the duration of the proceedings under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
The Minute also directs the cultural impact assessments by Ngati Te Ata and Ngati Tamaoho to be made available on the EPA website.
Minute 3 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 100KB)
On 8 March 2022, Barker & Associates Limited, on behalf of the applicant, provided a response to Minute 2 which requested clarification on the request to withhold information within the cultural impact assessments.
Waihoehoe Precinct response to Minute 2 (PDF, 147KB)
Attachment 1 – confirmation from Ngati Te Ata Waiohua (PDF, 100KB)
Attachment 2 – Ngati Te Ata Cultural Impact Assessment (PDF, 3.8MB)
Attachment 3 – confirmation from Ngati Tamaoho (PDF, 94KB)
Attachment 4 – Ngati Tamaoho Cultural Values Assessment addendum (PDF, 10MB)
28 February 2022 – Minute 2
The panel issued Minute 2 in response to the request from Barker and Associates on behalf of the applicant to withhold information under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Minute 2 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 100KB)
On 13 December 2021, Barker and Associates on behalf of Oyster Capital Limited wrote to the Panel seeking information contained within the cultural impact assessments to be withheld under the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.
Barker and Associates request for information to be withheld (PDF, 638KB)
28 February 2022 – Minute 1
The panel issued Minute 1 regarding people to be invited to comment, and opening and closing dates for comments. Minute 1 includes topics the panel is particularly interested in receiving comments on.
Minute 1 of the Waihoehoe Precinct panel (PDF, 144KB)
Correspondence to the panel
18 July 2022
Oyster Capital Limited withdrew its application for the Waihoehoe Precinct.
Notice of withdrawal on behalf of Oyster Capital (PDF, 115KB)
8 July 2022
The panel received a memorandum of counsel on behalf of the applicant in relation to the withdrawal of the Drury Centre Precinct application and Minute 13 issued by the Drury East Stage 1 Precinct Expert Consenting Panel.
Legal memo in relation to Drury Centre Precinct withdrawal (PDF, 195KB)
Attachment A: Stantec letter re Waihoehoe Precinct infrastructure (PDF, 382KB)
Attachment B : Waihoehoe Precinct infrastructure summary (PDF, 210KB)
Attachment C: Planning letter Waihoehoe Precinct (PDF, 136KB)
6 July 2022
The applicant provided a further response to Minute 15, as well as a response in relation to the addendum provided by Dr Ian Boothroyd.
Response to ecology addendum (PDF, 279KB)
Attachment 1: Stormwater flooding response addendum (PDF, 4.6MB)
Attachment 2: Civil response addendum (PDF, 4.6MB)
Attachment 3: NESF standard assessment (PDF, 114KB)
Attachment 4: Updated consent conditions, 6 July 2022 (PDF, 814KB)
1 July 2022
The applicant provided a response to Minute 15 from the Waihoehoe Precinct expert consenting panel.
Technical report in response to Minute 15 (PDF, 457KB)
Attachment 1: Stormwater and flooding response - T+T (PDF, 5.1MB)
Attachment 2: Updated conditions July 2022 (PDF, 809KB)
Attachment 3: Landscape response - LA4 (PDF, 2.4MB)
Attachment 4: Civil response - Crang Civil (PDF, 15MB)
Attachment 5: Memorandum of Counsel - Jeremy Brabant (PDF, 3MB)
Attachment 6: Pedestrian accessway CPTED memo - B&A (PDF, 1.5MB)
Attachment 7: Transport response - Stantec (PDF, 9.7MB)
Attachment 8: Ecology response - Ecological Solutions (PDF, 1.3MB)
21 June 2022
Auckland Council provided an update on the Environment Court appeals filed on the three Drury private plan changes, Private Plan Change 48 by Kiwi Property Holdings No. 2 Limited, Private Plan Change 49 by Fulton Hogan Land Developments Limited, and Private Plan Change 50 by Oyster Capital Limited.
Auckland Council memorandum 21 June (PDF, 158KB)
20 June 2022
The panel received a memorandum on behalf of the applicant, requesting the panel to direct expert conferencing.
Memorandum of Counsel on behalf of Oyster Capital requesting expert conferencing (PDF, 125KB)
7 June 2022
The panel received a memorandum on behalf of the applicant requesting that processing of the application is resumed from 17 June 2022.
Memorandum to the panel requesting resumption of processing (PDF, 149KB)
26 May 2022
As requested in Minute 11, the applicant provided an interim response to a request for further information, relating to stormwater matters.
Attachment 3 response by Crang Civil (PDF, 213KB)
Attachment 4 response by Tonkin + Taylor (PDF, 696KB)
23 May 2022
The panel received correspondence on behalf of the applicant requesting processing of the application to be suspended from 17 May 2022.
Letter requesting suspension of processing (PDF, 152KB)
19 April 2022
The panel received correspondence on behalf of the applicant requesting processing of the application resumes from 21 April 2022.
Letter requesting resumption of processing of the application (PDF, 139KB)
24 March 2022
The panel received correspondence on behalf of the applicant requesting processing of the application to be suspended from 24 March 2022.
Letter requesting suspension of processing (PDF, 157KB)
2 March 2022
The applicant provided a copy of the cultural impact assessment (CIA) by Te Ākitai Waiohua as requested by the panel in Minute 2. Express permission has been provided by Te Ākitai Waiohua for this CIA to be made publicly available.
Cultural impact assessment by Te Ākitai Waiohua (PDF, 1.3MB)